Articles   Dev Forums   Personalize   Favorites   Member Login   ASP Hosting      Active Users:  90
DevASP - ASP and XML Articles, Samples, Toturials, Sample Chapters and resources for Developers Friday, May 09, 2008
Home
Articles & Samples
ASP Hosting
Dev Search
Dev Forum
Add Your Articles
Add a Listing
Sample Chapters
Directory Feed
Link to US
Contact

Search Directory
Applications
Articles & Samples
Components
Community
Database
Developer Sites
Downloads
Hosting Services
Introduction
Knowledge Base
Sample Chapters
WebCasts

Trusted by over 7 million customers!
ASP Directory
Applications
Articles & Samples
Components
Developer Sites
Knowledge Base
Sample Chapters
WebCasts
XML Directory
Applications
Articles & Samples
Developer Sites
Error, Bugs & Fixes
Downloads
Introduction
Knowledge Base
Sample Chapters
WebCasts

XML Strengths and Weaknesses with DOM, ASP and XSL

Author: Nakul Goyal

Download Source Files

Introduction

Since the inception of XML, many developers have wondered why we need XML... How is it better than HTML and what does it do? For starters, XML is far more powerful than HTML, and the power resides in the "X" in XML (which stands for extensible). Rather than providing a set of pre-defined tags (as in the case of HTML), XML specifies the standards with which you can define your own markup languages with their own sets of tags. XML is therefore a meta-markup language, allowing you to define an infinite number of markup languages based upon the standards defined by XML.

XML was created so that richly structured documents could be used over the web. The only viable alternatives, HTML and SGML, are not practical for this purpose. XML allows you to define all sorts of tags with all sorts of rules, such as tags representing business rules or tags representing data description or data relationships.

In this article we're going to take a look at some of the terminology that comes with using XML and its related technologies, as well as how to create and transform XML documents with XSL using Microsoft's MSXML parser. To test the code samples shown in this article you should be running Windows NT/2000/XP with IIS installed. You should also have SQL server 2000 installed on the same machine.

XML Definitions

As with any technology, XML has its own acronym-riddled lingo. Some of the important acronyms include:
  • DTD: In XML, the definition of a valid markup is handled by a Document Type Definition (DTD), which communicates the structure of the markup language. The DTD specifies the validity of each tag.
  • XSL: The Extensible Style Language (XSL) is the style language for XML that allows us to transform XML nodes using a set of patterns and templates.
  • XML Pointer Language (XPointer) and XML Linking Language (XLink): These two technologies define a standard way to represent links between resources. In addition to simple links like HTML's <a> tag, XML has mechanisms for linking between multiple resources and linking between read-only resources. XPointer describes how to address a resource whereas XLink describes how to associate two or more resources.
  • XML Flow Architecture: XML offers a three-tier architecture. It can be generated from existing databases that employ a 3-tier model themselves. We can maintain business rules separately.
Why XML Should Be Used?
Using XML provides us as developers with a number of benefits. Some of the most obvious benefits include:
  • Authors and providers can design their documents using XML, instead of being stuck with HTML. They can be explicitly tailored for an audience, so the cumbersome problems with HTML are theoretically eliminated; therefore both authors and designers are free to invent their own markup elements.
  • Information can be richer and is easier to access and manipulate because the hypertext linking abilities of XML are much more advanced than those found in HTML.
  • XML can provide more (and improved) facilities for browser presentation and performance.
XML compresses exceedingly well. Since data compression algorithms operate on the concept of maximizing the entropy of a given input stream, it stands to reason that a highly ordered input stream consisting of regular, repeating tag sequences will compress exceedingly well... much better than standard text which contains generally far less order thus resulting in a decrease in performance.

Weaknesses of XML
XML is obviously not a cure-all language free of any disadvantages... otherwise we would be using XML to markup/represent all of our data, and nothing else! There are of course some drawbacks and weaknesses of XML, namely:
  • XML markup can be incredibly verbose, depending on the vocabulary in question.
  • All the pieces of the XML puzzle aren't yet in place, certainly not from a standards-compliant viewpoint anyhow. We've got both XSL and XSLT, however they are not fully developed yet.
  • There are still some problems with Microsoft's XML Parser.
  • XML Hypertext Transfer Protocol (XML-HTTP) still has some minute problems.
Performance of XML
When you're designing an XML-based Web application, what kind of performance hit do you expect to put on your web server? It's hard to generalize because there are so many variables (such as the size of the XML document, the amount of script code required to process the document, the amount of output generated, etc) to take into consideration, however the following list shows the major variables that can affect the performance of parsing XML:
  • The Kind of XML Data being parsed.
  • The ratio of tags to text.
  • The ratio of attributes to elements.
  • The amount of discarded white space in the document.

Have Questions? Discuss this topic in Dev Forum

Next .....>>>>
DevASP - Privacy - Disclaimer
Copyright © 2008 DevASP.com